Weight copying is a controversial topic in the Bittensor community. In this article, we look to explain weight copying and pros and cons of weight copying.

What is weight copying?

Validators weigh the work of each miner and create a ranked scoring - this is called setting weights. The weights are taken to the Yuma consensus to create the trust score for all of the validators.

Vtrust is the scoring of validators - and to score well in Vtrust, your weights must be similar to those of every other validator.

weight copying is when a validator copies the scores from the Yuma consensus, and uses them to place their weights. This ensures a high Vtrust.

Why Weight copying?

When a validator uses the scoring from the Yuma consensus to place weights - they will score an extremely high Vtrust. High Vtrust leads to a higher percentage of emissions - which leads to higher revenue.

• On some subnets, miners will actively ignore requests from validators with low stake. To get a high stake, you need good results. It puts new validators in a chicken/egg situation. By weight copying, the validator is able to show good returns, and gain delegation.

Reasons to not weight copy

Validators that weight copy are not contributing to the Bittensor ecosystem. Validation of the miners is an essential part of the checks and balances of the Biottensor ecosystem. Weight copying does not give back into the ecosystem, and pushes the work onto a smaller group of validators.

Subnets are beginning to block access to the data to validators who weight copy - forcing all nodes to be active participants in the network.

Weight copying in Taostats

Validators who are suspected of weight copying have their nom/24 HR/1ktaoscore in red. This indicates that while their return may be higher, that they are not contributing back to the bittensor community. If you are staking tao, you can choose to support the community and those validators who are giving back.